2007 Grade 3-8 English Test Results

 

Index of Slides : Graphic Version 800x600

  1. 2007
  2. Raising Achievement
  3. Raising Achievement
  4. Raising Achievement
  5. The Bottom Line: Scores are Up, Especially in Middle School
  6. The Bottom Line: ELL Students Did Better Than Predicted
  7. The Bottom Line: Students with Disabilities Improved
  8. Achievement is up statewide, especially in the middle grades. Important because middle school performance has lagged.
  9. English Language Learners did better than predicted, despite the tremendous increase in the numbers who took the test. More than 3/4 of ELL students are in New York City.
  10. A smaller percentage of ELL students showed serious academic problems in 2007 than in 2006.
  11. Performance differences among racial/ethnic groups were substantial across grades 3-8. The Hispanic group includes the largest percentage of ELL students (22%); the Asian group the second largest percentage (11%).
  12. In every grade, fewer students with disabilities showed serious academic problems.
  13. Here's More of the Story
  14. Achievement is up statewide, especially in the middle grades.
  15. Fewer students showed serious academic problems in every grade except grade 3.
  16. No Title
  17. Performance of English Language Learners
  18. English Language Learners did better than predicted, despite the tremendous increase in the numbers who took the test. More than 3/4 of ELL students are in New York City.
  19. A smaller percentage of ELL students showed serious academic problems in 2007 than in 2006.
  20. A higher percentage of English Language Learners in New York City achieved the learning standards in 2007 than in 2006. More than 3/4 of ELL students are in New York City.
  21. In New York City, fewer English Language Learners showed serious academic problems in 2007 than in 2006.
  22. Performance of Students Who Are Not English Language Learners
  23. Statewide, in each grade, more students who were not English Language Learners met the standards in 2007 than in 2006.
  24. Statewide, in every grade, fewer students who were not English Language Learners showed serious academic problems in 2007 than in 2006.
  25. Students Who Were Not English Language Learners: In New York City, the percentage of students meeting the standards increased in 2007. Performance in the middle grades especially increased.
  26. In New York City, a smaller percentage of students who were not ELL showed serious academic problems in 2007.
  27. Results by Racial/Ethnic Group
  28. Performance differences among racial/ethnic groups were substantial across grades 3-8. The Hispanic group includes the largest percentage of ELL students (22%); the Asian group the second largest percentage (11%).
  29. The percentage of students with serious academic problems decreased for all racial/ethnic groups except Asian-Americans.
  30. Results for Students with Disabilities
  31. The percentage of students with disabilities meeting the standards increased in 2007, although results remained low.
  32. In every grade, fewer students with disabilities showed serious academic problems.
  33. No Title
  34. No Title
  35. Among the Big 5 Cities, New York City had the largest percentage of students with disabilities meeting the standards. A larger percentage of students met the Standards in 2007 than in 2006.
  36. Fewer students showed serious academic problems in 2007 than in 2006.
  37. Results by Gender
  38. The disparity in graduation rate is foreshadowed by the larger percentage of females than males who meet the standards at every grade level.
  39. Results by Need/Resource Capacity Category For All Students
  40. No Title
  41. No Title
  42. Results for the Big 5 Cities
  43. The Big 5 showed substantial differences in meeting the standards in grades 3-8.
  44. In each Big 5 district, fewer students showed serious problems in 2007 than in 2006.
  45. The Bottom Line: Scores are Up, Especially in Middle School
  46. The Bottom Line: ELL Students Did Better Than Predicted
  47. The Bottom Line: Students with Disabilities Improved
  48. No Title
  49. No Title
  50. No Title
  51. Regents Actions to Support Literacy
  52. Regents Actions to Support Literacy
  53. No Title
  54. 2007

Return to Format List