![]() |
Back to EMSC Home SED Home Disclaimers and Notices |
The following are instructions for applying for a 2005-06 Learning Technology Grant. The purpose of this grant program is to improve student academic performance in relation to the New York State learning standards with a particular focus on mathematics Pre-K-12 and English Language Arts (ELA) including early literacy, through the integration of educational technology in classroom activities.
The State Education Department encourages coordination across all federal and State educational programs including Model Schools, Teacher Resource and Computer Training Centers, Special Education Training and Resource Centers, and Bilingual Educational Technical Assistance Centers.
While only public school districts and Boards of Cooperative Educational Services (BOCES), or consortia thereof, are eligible to apply for funds, according to State legislation they must include nonpublic schools of all denominations including nonsectarian private schools located within the district/BOCES boundaries as substantial and equitable partners in technology acquisition and activities outlined in the application.
Questions regarding this application can be emailed to the contacts listed below. All questions and answers will be posted here.
|
Submit Applications To: |
New York
State Education Department |
|
SED Contacts: |
New York
City: |
|
Due Date: |
Postmarked by July 8, 2005 |
|
Number of Copies: |
One (1) original and three (3) copies (Faxes will not be accepted.) |
The State Education Department does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, religion, creed, disability, marital status, veteran status, national origin, race gender, or genetic predisposition or carrier status, or sexual orientation in its educational programs, services and activities. Portions of any publication designed for distribution can be made available in a variety of formats, including Braille, large print or audiotape, upon request. Inquiries regarding this policy of nondiscrimination should be directed to the Department’s Office for Diversity, Ethics, and Access, Room 152, Education Building, Albany, NY 12234.
Legislative and Regulation Summary:
The State
budget appropriates funds for school districts and BOCES to offer learning
technology programs in accordance with Commissioner’s Regulations, Section
144.8. Learning technology programs involve training and the use of
learning technologies to enhance classroom instruction, curriculum, assessment,
and restructuring of the teaching and learning process.
Learning Technologies Include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program
Priorities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program Requirements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Program Purpose:
The New York State Learning Technology Grant Program promotes collaboration between public school districts/BOCES and nonpublic schools of all denominations to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While a wide
range of technologies may assist with instruction, the key to improving student
academic achievement is a qualified teacher. Grant recipients must provide high quality professional
development on the integration of technologies, including emerging technologies,
into curricula and instruction and use these technologies to create new learning
environments. For this reason, at least 45
percent of the project budget must be devoted to delivery of professional
development activities, including mentoring and/or in-classroom coaching of
teachers and standards-based Peer Review
training.
Eligible Applicants:
All public school districts and BOCES, or consortiums thereof, are eligible to receive a grant. Applicants must give nonpublic schools within their boundaries the opportunity to participate. Applicants must also include at least one SURR or SINI school building in the application to be considered for funding. Charter schools are not eligible to receive a grant but may be included as a participating school in an application.
Number Of Copies:
Submit one (1) original and three (3) copies of the application and FS-10. The original signature of the Superintendent or District Superintendent must be on the FS-10 and the Statement of Assurances in blue ink.
Final Reports:
Please submit a 3 to 5 page summary of completed
project activities by July 31, 2006. All districts and BOCES other than
New York City should send this summary to Connie Centrello’s Office of
Curriculum and Support Services NYSED, Room 320 EB, Albany, NY 12234. New
York City schools should forward final reports to Ken Chieu’s Office of NYC
School and Community Services, 55 Hanson Place, Room 482, Brooklyn, NY
11217.
Proposal Narrative and Rating Criteria:
The proposal narrative must include and will be reviewed in accordance with the following criteria. It must not exceed 14 pages, not including the completed FS-10.
|
Project Abstract (Cover
Page) |
|
Proposal Narrative and Rating Criteria |
Points |
|
1. Description of the Applicant’s Needs: a) Provide a clear statement
indicating the ELA, including early literacy, and/or mathematics PreK-12
and technology needs to be addressed in the proposed project. b) Indicate the steps that will be taken to assess the needs for all participating schools including non-public school(s). Use relevant data, including data from the New York State School Report Card. c) Explain how the proposed program
will integrate with the technology plan(s) of the participating
district(s). Note: Identify all school building(s) that will be participating in the program on the Participating School Data Form. Also list participating nonpublic, SURR and SINI schools on the Application Checklist.
|
10 |
|
2. Objectives: List clear, realistic, measurable objectives for the proposed project that address the academic and technology needs identified above. Link them to student attainment of State learning standards, key ideas and performance indicators.
|
10 |
|
3. Project Activities, Outline and Timeline: a) List the activities, methods or strategies that will be conducted to achieve the objectives identified above. Include a timeline. Activities must be based on research relevant to student attainment of State learning standards. b) Indicate how technology will be employed to improve classroom instruction rather than being placed in computer labs.
|
25 |
|
4. Collaborative Planning and Involvement of Nonpublic Schools: a) Describe the process followed to
consult with nonpublic schools of all denominations and nonsectarian
private schools in the service area. List the schools
contacted. b) Describe how nonpublic schools have
participated in the planning of this proposal. c) Describe how participating nonpublic schools will be full partners in the acquisition of equipment, software and the professional development components of this project. Include numbers to show equitable participation. |
10 |
|
5. Professional Development: a) Describe how the planned professional development program will help teachers to integrate technology into the curriculum and classroom Instruction. b)
Describe how the planned professional development will be sustained
over time and how it will be linked to the needs, objectives and
activities listed above. c)
Describe how the
integration of technology into the classroom will be supported through
in-classroom coaching, mentoring, or peer demonstration. d) Describe how the professional development will build the capacity of teachers to make use of web-based content, tools and resources to enhance classroom instruction. |
20 |
|
6. Project Evaluation: a) Describe how impact of this proposal
on students’ academic b) Include clear, realistic and measurable objectives.
c) Describe the key ideas and performance indicators used to measure the achievement of the project’s objectives. |
15 |
|
7. Budget and Budget Narrative: a) Submit a detailed FS-10 budget. Please remember: · At least 45 percent of the proposed grant must be allocated for professional development on effective uses of the technology for teaching and learning. ·
Equipment
expenditures may not exceed 45 percent of the total budget.
Note that equipment with a unit cost of less than $5,000 and
recorded in the supply code will still be considered as part of the 45
percent. ·
A maximum of
5 percent of the budget may be used for program administration and
technical support. ·
A maximum of
5 percent of the budget may be spent on
evaluation. b) Also submit a budget narrative that explains how the items in the FS-10 are linked to the proposed program. For example, the narrative should explain which items in the FS-10 are part of the proposed professional development program or how proposed hardware and software purchases will help achieve the objectives of the program.
c) Describe how funds from other
sources will be used
to supplement the grant funds requests |
5 |
|
8. Background and Experience of Project Staff: a) Describe project staffing, including the number and type of positions. b) Describe the duties and amount of time each staff person will devote to project activities. c) Explain the qualifications and experience of proposed staffing.
|
5
|
Method of Award:
Complete proposals will be reviewed by at least two reviewers and scored according to the point criteria indicated. An application must receive a final average score of 75 to be considered for funding. If not enough applications meet this minimum score, the Department reserves the right to lower the minimum score. If individual scores are more than 20 points apart, another reviewer will rate the application. The two scores closest in numeric value will be averaged and used to rank the application.
Proposals will be separated into two categories, those from New York City Public Schools and those from all other public school districts, BOCES and consortium thereof. As in previous years, $1.2 million will be set aside for New York City schools and $2.09 million will be set aside for the schools in the rest of the State.
SED will review the budgets and eliminate any items that are deemed unallowable or inappropriate including repairs, minor remodeling or construction in nonpublic schools.
Grant awards of up to $50,000 will be made. In the event that more than one application in New York City or in the rest of the State receives the same final average score, the applications will be ranked according to the following:
06/15/2007