![]() |
Back to EMSC Home SED Home Disclaimers and Notices |
Engineers of the Future Program Questions and Answers
Question #1:
Can an institution submit more than one application for the Summer Training
for Teachers in Engineers of the Future Programs 2007?
Answer #1:
As indicated in the RFP, “Only one application should be submitted whether
one region or more than one region is to be served. An application will be
categorized and reviewed for funding according to the region it serves. An
application that serves more than one region will be categorized with the
Statewide funds.” This being said, if an eligible applicant proposed to offer
two markedly different trainings for two different participant groups they could
submit more than one application which would be categorized according to the RFP
language above.
Question #2:
Can the funds be used to train in any of the following fields:
biotechnology, construction/architecture, information technology (including
programming, networks, web design, computer forensics, or digital media), and/or
manufacturing technology?
Answer #2:
Yes, the technology areas mentioned all fall within the broad Technology
Content Organizers as outlined in the Technology Education Framework http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/ciai/mst/Initiative.htm
. Please refer to the RFP for additional criteria expected of the training.
Question #3:
Can the funds be used to integrate engineering/technology concepts into
traditional math and science courses, or must it all be directed towards
stand-alone pre-engineering/technology courses?
Answer #3:
Yes, curricula in this instance are defined as lessons, units or courses
that utilize rigorous engineering-related content developed and implemented by
the participants in their classrooms.
Question #4:
Can the funds be used to create career pathways and then train counselors
and teachers (and perhaps parents and students directly) in engineering career
pathways?
Answer #4:
Funds must be used to provide training to participating teachers that have
committed to implementing engineering-related content into their classrooms.
This includes career-related information.
Question #5:
Can the funds be used to bring together middle school, high school, and
college faculty to discuss expectations, and align curriculum?
Answer #5:
This activity could be considered a part of the recruiting criteria or a
component of the actual training that participants receive. Its purpose would
need to be described in the proposal in the appropriate section.
Question #6
Can the funds be used to buy supplies/equipment for those who have been
trained?
Answer #6:
Reasonable and necessary supplies/equipment for use by participants in the
training are acceptable. Costs associated with implementing and sustaining the
course in the participant school district is the responsibility of the school
district.
Question #7:
Can the funds be used to hold roundtables with school (faculty,
administration, counselors) and technology business leaders to discuss career
options and expectations; we'd then begin to align curriculum, implement career
pathways, and provide opportunities for business/partnerships (including guest
speaker series, MST career expo, job shadowing, and internships).
Answer #7:
The activities mentioned are all acceptable as long as they result in
building on participant knowledge that will result in rigorous
engineering-related content in the classroom.
Question #8:
Can the funds be used to provide opportunities for educators to job shadow
at a technology company ("Educator in the Workplace").
Answer #8:
The activities mentioned are all acceptable as long as they result in
building on participant knowledge that will result in rigorous
engineering-related content in the classroom.
Question #9:
Is there a limitation on the dollar amount that the university could
allocate per teacher or per school district (i.e., 50% of training costs)?
Answer #9:
No
Question #10:
When is it anticipated the awards would be granted, as planning for summer
training needs to take place early in the spring?
Answer #10:
Proposals are due March 12, 2007 with reviews, scoring and awards made as
soon after as practical. All awards must be reviewed by the Office of the State
Comptroller prior to notification.
Question #11:
Can the funds be used to cover stipends and/or travel expenses for educators
to attend the workshops?
Answer #11:
The RFP indicates, “Budgets should include all expenses associated with the
teacher’s participation, course materials and room and board, if applicable.
Participating teacher’s travel to the summer training may not be included.”
Question #12:
I would like to know if there will be any start-up money for such a program?
Answer #12:
Grant funds must be spent only on training for teachers that will implement
rigorous engineering-related curricula in the classroom. Commitments by school
districts to implement the curricula must take place prior to the training which
must take place between May 1 and August 31, 2007.
Question #13:
Can the teachers participating in the summer training be paid a stipend
from the project budget?
Answer #13:
Yes
Question #14:
The stated project period for summer training is between 5/1/07 and 8/31/07.
You state in the application: "Up to 5% of the grant may be used to evaluate the
extent to which the training improves the content knowledge and classroom
application of the participating teachers related to their current or likely
future teaching assignment."
We think this means, since K-12 classes do not begin until September, that up to
5% project funds can be used AFTER 8/31/07 to conduct classroom based evaluation
of how the summer training improves the "classroom application of the
participating teachers." Is this a correct assumption?
Answer #14:
Projects may end October 31, 2007 in order to complete the evaluation and
reporting on the program. However, the training must take place anytime between May
1 and August 31, 2007. Specific information
pertaining to evaluation and reporting format will be provided to successful
grant recipients when they are notified of their award.
Question #15:
Summer teacher training programs or institutes are very costly to run. Is
there an upper limit, beyond the stated limit for a particular region, for a
summer training proposal?
Answer #15:
Funding for proposed programs in a specific region can not exceed the total
amount allocated for that region.
Question #16:
If our institution submitted a well-justified application that would use
most or all of our regions funding allocation for this program, would this make
our application less competitive than an application submitted for a more modest
portion of the regional allocation?
Answer #16:
This question cannot be fully answered without knowing what the program
involved. Note that the budget constitutes 20 out of 100 points when proposals
are reviewed.
02/15/2007