EMSC Banner for Content Pages. The banner reads, "New York State Education Department 
        (NYSED), Elementary, Middle, Secondary and Continuing Education (EMSC)" Back to EMSC Home
SED Home
Disclaimers and Notices
 

Questions & Answers

Title II Part D Enhancing Education through Technology
Competitive Grant Application
 

Question #1

Who can be the fiscal agent for this grant?

Answer #1

Local Education Agencies (LEAs) can be the fiscal agent for this grant. For the purposes of this grant, public school districts, charter schools and        BOCES are all considered LEAs. Previously the RFP stated that the fiscal agent had to be a high-need LEA. The RFP has been changed to allow all LEAs to be the fiscal agent.

However, in order to comply with Part 3e of the NYSED Consortium Policy included in the RFP, the fiscal agent cannot act solely as the fiscal agent or flow-through for grant funds to pass to other recipients. The fiscal agent needs to provide direct services to be allowed to serve as fiscal agent.

Question #2

According to the poverty chart in the application, eligibility starts with having 3,000 students in poverty to receive $125,000. If our school district has less than 3,000 poverty students, is the district not eligible to apply?

Answer #2

Your school district is not eligible to apply if it has fewer than 3,000 students in poverty. However, your school district may partner with other LEAs to meet this requirement.

Eligible applicants (a high-need local educational agency or an eligible local partnership) must have at least 3,000 students in poverty to apply for this grant. In addition, if an eligible local partnership has over 5,000 students in poverty, the application will be given 20 extra preference points.

Question #3

I read over the information. Am I right that you need at least 3000 students in poverty to apply? This would mean that unless our BOCES teams up with another, we are not eligible to apply?

Answer #3

Yes. See answer #2. In order for a BOCES to apply, it must partner with at least one of the high-need LEAs listed on Attachment 1, and the partnership must have at least 3,000 students in poverty.

Question #4

Can a single school be considered an LEA or for the purposes of this grant?

Answer #4

Only if it is a charter school. An LEA is a public school district, charter school or BOCES or, in New York City, a community school district.

Question #5

Can an Eligible Local Partnership consist of a group of schools and a University?

Answer #5

An Eligible Local Partnership can consist of a public school district(s) and/or charter school(s) and a University as long as at least one of the school districts or charter schools is a high-need local education agency listed on Attachment 1 and at least one of the school districts or charter schools can demonstrate that the teachers in the schools served by the grant are effectively integrating technology and generating sustained progress and success implementing evidence-based model program(s) into teaching and learning process and improving student’s academic performance in core subject areas and technology literacy and skills. Under this grant program, A University must be a provider, not a recipient, of services.

Also, there must be at least 3,000 students in poverty in the participating school district(s) and/or charter school(s).

Question #6

Must one of the schools in an Eligible Local Partnership be performing well and integrating technology successfully? If so, how should this performance status and successful integration be determined?

Answer #6

Yes. Applications must document the previous experiences and success in technology integration initiatives.

Question #7

What are we supposed to put on the Form A? If I list all of the schools and the number of students served it will add up to more than 3,209. Please advise on how I should handle Form A as it will not reconcile with the federal numbers.

Answer #7

On Form A, list each participating school district/school building and charter school. In the “Total Number of Students” column, list the total number of students enrolled in each building. In the “Number of Students in Poverty” column, do not list the number of students in poverty for each building. List only the number of students in poverty for each participating district and charter school, using the numbers on Attachments 1 and 2.

Question #8

My district qualifies as a possible applicant for the EETT grant due to the fact that one of our schools is a SINI school. However in reading the criteria and grant amounts, we do not have enough students of poverty. That would be the case even if we formed a consortium. We could not even begin to approach a threshold of 3,000 students in poverty, unless we partnered with a large city district. So I am wondering how SED plans to allocate funds for upstate districts that are smaller. Are some funds "reserved" for smaller areas or will all the funds go to large city districts? Please let me know as soon as possible whether we should consider applying or not

Answer #8

This particular grant is being targeted to applicants with at least 3,000 students in poverty.

Question #9

The RFP indicates an applicant with 3,000 to 3,999 children in poverty can apply for up to $125,000, with grant awards increasing as the # of children in poverty increases. Can a high need district listed on Attachment 1 that has less than 3,000 children in poverty apply on its own? Or do they need to partner with another district to reach the minimum “3,000 children in poverty” mark? And if they can apply on their own, can they apply for up to $125,000? Lastly, is the grant amount per year or is it over the two years?

Answer #9

See the answer to question #2. The grant amount listed on the chart is per year.

Question #10

Would you explain in detail the following statement under Eligible Applicants, "Has a substantial need for assistance in acquiring and using technology". We would like a definition of substantial need, citing examples.

Answer #10

Due to the lack of data on “substantial need for assistance in acquiring and using technology”, we are using only the high concentration of students in poverty along with SINI and SRAP status to define which LEAs are high-need LEAs.

Question #11

Will there be a meeting about the RFP?

Answer #11

No.

Question #12

Do the students enrolled in the non-public schools who participate in our proposal count towards the total number of students?

Answer #12

They have already been included in the number of students in poverty listed for each school district and charter school listed on Attachments 1 and 2. When you complete Form A, only list the number of students in poverty for each participating school district and/or charter school using the numbers on Attachments 1 and 2. Also list any participating nonpublic schools with the total number of students enrolled in those schools.

Question #13

Do all students or just the number of students listed in “number in poverty” defined in Attachments 1 and 2 count towards the minimum of 3000 students?

Answer #13

Only the number of students listed in “number in poverty” defined in Attachments 1 and 2 count towards the minimum of 3000 students.

Question #14

We have two buildings in our district that are SRAP buildings. Does our proposed program have to focus on those two buildings or can the program be a district-wide, non-building restricted program?

Answer #14

Your program must focus on addressing the needs of those two buildings but can also address the needs of other buildings.

Question #15

How do we exclude those students not in poverty from EETT funded services?

Answer #15

Your program must focus on addressing the needs of school buildings and districts identified as in need of improvement but can also address the needs in other buildings. Students not in poverty do not need to be excluded.

Question #16

If we partner with other school districts that have different needs than ours - for example - one may be a SINI school in a partner district because of ELA performance at their middle school; another might be a SRAP school because of special ed. performance at a high school, etc. - then will the program that we propose need to address all of the issues identified in each partner school?

Answer #16

Your partnership must collaborate to decide what needs it wants to address and how best to address them for the participating districts and/or charter schools.

Question #17

The funding availability chart starts with: 3,000 to 3,999 children in poverty. If we decided to apply on our own (with the private schools in our district) then the number of children in poverty might total around 700. Is 3,000 the minimum or could we apply for funding for our 700 and what would be the maximum amount that we could apply for?

Answer #17

See answer #2. The minimum is 3,000. You can not apply for funding for your 700.

Question #18

Under Program Requirements numbers 6, 7, and 8, the percent of funding to be used adds up to a total of 95%. For what is the other 5% to be used?

Answer #18

The percentage requirements are not meant to total to 100%, and they do not apply to every budget category or item that may be included in your budget. Program requirements #6 and #7 describe minimum percentages that must be used for professional development and evaluation, while #8 refers to the maximum percentage requirements for equipment and administration. For instance, the spending on equipment can be less than 40 percent while the expenditure for professional development can be more than 40 percent.

Question #19

The funds will be allocated by four regional groups. Out of the $11,700,000 available for the program, how much funding will be allocated to each group?

Answer #19

New York City – 61%
Big 4 - 8%
Rural - 5%
Other - 26%

 

10/18/2007