![]() |
Back to EMSC Home SED Home Disclaimers and Notices |
Program Purpose/Goal
The primary purpose of the program is to improve students’ academic performance
in the core subject areas of English language arts, mathematics, science and
technology literacy through effective use of technology in the process of
teaching and learning. To operationalize the primary goal of the program, the
NYS EETT Competitive Grant Program in consultation with the field experts and
practitioners has identified the following five theme-oriented categories of
education technology programs. Winning applications with focus on one of the
themes as well as adoption of evidence-based model program(s) or effective
strategies will be funded with the EETT Competitive Grants.
The five theme-oriented and evidence-based program categories are listed below
(some sub-themes under each category are just suggested for but not limited to
consideration and exploration):
Leadership and System Change through Technology Innovation;
a. Educational Leadership in Technology Infusion (administrators, students)
b. System Change of Teaching and Learning through Technology
c. Innovative Technology Integration for 21st Century Learning
Technology Infusion into Instruction through Professional
Development;
a. Embedded Professional Development on Technology Infusion
b. Pairing and Mentoring Professional Development on Technology Infusion
c. Data-driven and Customized Professional Development on Technology
Infusion
Data-driven Differentiated Instruction and Learning;
a. Data-driven customized instruction
b. Adaptive Assessment and Learning
c. Performance-based and Innovative Learning
Technology Literacy and ICT Skills Development and
Assessment; and
a. Development and Assessment of ICT Literacy and Skills
b. Project-based Learning and Assessment of ICT Skills
c. Integrated Approach to ICT Literacy and Skills Attainment in Core
Curricula
Expanding Learning Opportunities through Online Teaching and
Learning;
a. Online Professional Development
b. Online Courses for Students
c. Online Formative Assessment
While the five categories of educational technology programs are
not necessarily exclusive in operation or implementation, an application must
clearly focus its grant program on one of the five categories with its program
strategies and activities to be engaged in support of the selected theme of the
program. The application must signify the focus on the cover page of the
application.
Promising practices in the use of education technology and development of
quality digital tools and content supported by this grant program will remain as
public property and may be incorporated and shared widely through the New York
State Virtual Learning System (NYSVLS).
Eligible Applicants
As defined in the NCLB Legislation, Sections 2403 and 2404, eligible applicants
for Title II Part D must be either a “high-need local educational agency” or an
“eligible local partnership”.
A “high-need local educational agency” as listed in Attachment 1 is a local
educational agency that:
Is among the local educational agencies in a State with the highest numbers or percentages of children from families with incomes below the poverty line; and
Operates one or more schools identified (as in need of improvement or corrective action) under section 1116; or
Has a substantial need for assistance in acquiring and using
technology.
An “eligible local partnership” is a partnership that includes
at least one high-need local educational agency and at least one local
educational agency that can demonstrate that teachers in schools served by the
agency are effectively integrating technology and generating sustained progress
and success implementing evidence-based model program(s) into teaching and
learning processes and improving students’ academic performance in core subject
areas and technology literacy and skills. Such a partnership may also include
one of the following service providing partners:
An institution of higher education that is in full compliance with the reporting requirements of section 207(f) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 and that has not been identified by the State as low-performing under section 208 of such Act; or
A for-profit business or organization that develops, designs, manufactures, or produces technology products or services, and has (at least three years) expertise in the application of technology in instruction; or
A public or private nonprofit organization with demonstrated expertise in the application of education technology in instruction; and/or
Other local educational agencies, educational service
agencies, libraries, or other educational entities appropriate to provide
local programs.
See Attachment 1 for the list of the eligible “high-need local
educational agencies” in New York State and Attachment 2 for the list of
non-eligible local educational agencies which can participate in
consortium/partnership applications as contributing partners with their
experiences and expertise and number of students in poverty for services.
Due to the significant reduction in funding, applications from
consortium/partnership including multiple LEAs to pool and share resources,
experiences and expertise are strongly encouraged. Consortium/partnership applications from eligible local
partnerships with at least one eligible high-need local educational agency
having over 5,000 students in poverty or multiple eligible local educational
agencies having a total of over 5,000 students in poverty will be given 20 extra
preference points. One local educational agency either as a lead or consortium
partner can only participate in one application. No cross-partnership
applications from the same LEA(s) are permissible.
Consortium/partnership applications must focus on addressing the needs of the
school buildings and districts identified as in need of improvement within the
consortium/partnership. In addition, a local educational agency must serve as the fiscal agent for an eligible
local partnership or consortium. Accordingly, a BOCES may serve as a fiscal agent of
an eligible local partnership under section 2412(c) of the NCLB.
Non-public School Students and Teachers Participation
“High-need local educational agencies” and “eligible local
partnerships/consortium” must:
Engage in timely and meaningful consultation with appropriate private school(s) at the beginning of application development and
Continue consultation throughout the implementation of
program activities after application is awarded.
Such consultation should first determine whether the private
school(s) within the area(s) served by the “high-need local educational agency”
or “eligible local partnership” wishes to participate in the Title II Part D
competitive grant proposal. Applicants must provide documentation pertaining to
this consultation requirement on the Documentation of Private School
Consultation form (Form C). This form must include the signature of the
appropriate private school official(s). Also indicate on this form if no private
schools are located within the areas served by the “high-need local educational
agency” or “eligible local partnership.” Proposals will be considered incomplete
and will not be reviewed if such documentation is not provided.
If a private school wants to participate in the Title II Part D competitive
grant proposal, the consultation should address what services will be offered;
how, where and when services will be provided.
The applicant must provide, on an equitable basis, special educational services
or other benefits that address the needs of children, teachers, and other
educational personnel in private schools within the areas served by the
“high-need local educational agency” or “eligible local partnership.”
Expenditures for educational services for private school participants should be
proportional to the expenditures for public school participants based on the
number of students in poverty enrolled in respective school buildings.
Program Requirements
In order to be considered for funding, applications must meet the following
requirements:
Each applicant must clearly signify its program focus on one of the five theme-oriented program areas with its program components and activities directly supporting the focus of the proposed program.
Each applicant must demonstrate the purpose of EETT Program is of “sufficient scope and quality”, describe specific research- or evidence-based model program(s) or practices for adoption or replication, and delineate strategies, processes and accountability measures aligned to the articulated needs and goals of the proposed program.
Each applicant must demonstrate active engagement with curriculum and instructional leaders of participating LEAs during the development of the grant proposal in determining educational and technological needs to ensure that the proposed program focuses on effective instruction and student learning through technology integration.
Each applicant must conduct consultation with principal(s) or their designee(s) of private schools within the region during the development of their competitive grant proposal. This consultation must occur prior to making any decisions that will impact the participation of the private schools.
While a grant award may be made to a consortium, the focus of the grant must be on addressing the identified needs of those schools and districts in need of improvement (SINI or DINI) within in the consortium.
Each grantee must use at least 40 percent (40%) of its funds to provide ongoing, sustained and high-quality professional development for curriculum and instructional leaders including school administrators and classroom teachers, following the theme of the proposed program for effective technology integration for teaching and learning.
Each grantee must allocate 5 percent (5%) of its grant award for external evaluation with a coherent evaluation plan, clear outcome measures, benchmarks, and timelines to assess and inform the extent to which project strategies and activities funded are effective in achieving its proposed goals and objectives.
Each grantee must not spend more than forty percent (40%) of its funds for computing hardware or other equipment and not more than 10 percent (10%) on program administration.
Each grantee must ensure that necessary educational content and resources in the specified core subjects to be developed, subscribed or acquired with the support of the grant funds for instructional delivery or professional development must be aligned to current New York State Learning Standards and keyed to the level of specificity of Performance Indicators
Digital content and resources developed and/or acquired with
the project funding should remain as public property and may be incorporated
and shared widely through NYS Virtual Learning System (if applicable and
desirable).
Consortium/Partnership Applicant(s)
Applicant information for all partner agencies must be provided. Please complete
the Participating School List (Form A) for all participating LEAs and the
Service Providing Partners List (Form B).
Budget Category and Narrative Forms and Budget Summary Form
The applicant must complete the Budget Category and Narrative Forms (Form D) for
each category of expenditure that is required for the grant and the Budget
Summary Form (Form E: FS-20). The narrative must include sufficient detail to
allow reviewers to understand what the funds will be used for and the
relationship between the proposed expenditures and project activities and goals.
In addition, the Budget Allocation Matrix Form (Form F) must be completed to
demonstrate compliance of the proposed budget plan with the program guideline.
Information about the categories of expenditures, general information on
allowable costs and applicable federal costs principles and administrative
regulations are available in the Fiscal Guidelines for Federal and State Aided
Grants (http://www.oms.nysed.gov/cafe/guidelines.html)
The totals from each of the Budget Category Forms must correspond to amounts
shown on the Budget Summary Form (Form E: FS-20).
Grant Award Period and Grant Amounts
The grant award period will span two years beginning on January 1, 2008 and
ending December 31, 2009. Applicants must submit a budget narrative and budget
summary form covering each of the two program years. The budget narrative and
budget summary form will be reviewed and any inappropriate and/or unallowable
items will be eliminated.
Grants will be made for the first program year period from January 1, 2008 to
December 31, 2008 and then renewed for the second year operation contingent upon
satisfactory annual performance, compliance with program requirements and
continued availability of funds.
Grant awards will range from $125,000 to $500,000 based on the number of
students in poverty to be served in the proposed program according to the chart
below:
|
Number of Children Age 5-17 in Poverty |
Grant Award Range (for 12 months) |
|
3,000 to 3,999 |
up to $125,000 |
|
4,000 to 4,999 |
up to $175,000 |
|
5,000 to 5,999 |
up to $225,000 |
|
6,000 to 6,999 |
up to $275,000 |
|
7,000 to 7,999 |
up to $325,000 |
|
8,000 to 8,999 |
up to $375,000 |
|
9,000 to 9,999 |
up to $425,000 |
|
10,000 and above |
up to $500,000 |
Review and Rating of Applications
Only complete applications received by the due date will be reviewed. The
Proposal Narrative, exclusive of the budget narrative, must not exceed 25 pages,
with a font size of 12, single-spaced, and with one-inch margins. Any pages that
exceed the limit will not be reviewed.
Each accepted application will be reviewed and rated by at least two reviewers
according to the points indicated in the Proposal Narrative. Scores from each
reviewer will be added to compute the final average score. A third review will
be performed if there is a difference of at least 20 points between the two
scores. An application must receive a final average score of 70 to be considered
for funding, before the 20 preference points for consortium/partnership
application are added.
Budgets will be reviewed and rated on their appropriateness and/or
cost-effectiveness. SED will eliminate any items in the budget that are
unallowable or inappropriate (i.e. minor remodeling or office furniture, etc).
In the event of a tie score, the applicant with the higher score on item #2 Need
for Project in the Proposal Narrative will be ranked higher. Applications will
be ranked according to the final average score plus the 20 extra preference
points from highest to lowest in one of the following four Groups. Applications
from partnerships or consortia will be placed at the discretion of the SED in
the Group that most accurately represents the majority of its members. For
example if a partner from rural school district enters an agreement with a LEA
or consortium of school districts not considered as rural LEAs, the application
may be considered as an application from non-rural school districts application
as majority of the student body are not from the rural.
Funds will be allocated to each of the following regional groups based on its
relative share of the number of children ages 5 – 17 in poverty within local
educational agencies (using Census 2000 data provided by the USDOE).
New York City (five boroughs)
Big Four Cities (Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Yonkers)
Rural (as defined by the Needs and Resource Index)
Rest of State (outside the Big Five and non-rural LEAs based
on the Needs and Resource Index)
Awards will be made within each group in rank order of score
until funds are insufficient to fund the next ranking applicant in full.
Remaining funds will be offered to that applicant to run a smaller program. If
there are any remaining funds in a particular group after funding all successful
applications, the remaining funds will be proportionally redistributed to other
regional groups
The New York State Education Department reserves the right to reject all
proposals received or cancel this Grant if it is in the best interest of the
Department. The Department also reserves the right to negotiate minor adjustment
in the final budget based on application review results.
Grantees’ Responsibility
Projects must operate under the jurisdiction of the local board of education of
the lead LEA which serves as the fiscal agent for the grant or other appropriate
governing body and are subject to at least the same degree of accountability as
all other expenditures of the local agency. The local board of education or
other appropriate governing body is responsible for the proper disbursement of,
and accounting for, project funds. Written agency policy concerning wages,
mileage and travel allowances, overtime compensation and fringe benefits, as
well as State rules pertaining to competitive bidding, safety regulations, and
inventory control must be followed. Supporting or source documents are required
for all grant related transactions entered into the local agency's recordkeeping
system. Source documents that authorize the disbursement of grant funds consist
of purchase orders, contracts, time & effort records, delivery receipts, vendor
invoices, travel documentation and payment documents, including check stubs.
Supporting documentation for grants and grant contracts must be kept for at least six years after the last payment was made unless otherwise specified by program requirements. Additionally, audit or litigation will "freeze the clock" for records retention purposes until the issue is resolved. All records and documentation must be available for inspection by State Education Department officials or its representatives.
For additional information about grants, please refer to the Fiscal Guidelines
for Federal and State Aided Grants (http://www.oms.nysed.gov/cafe/)
Project Reports Requirement
At the initial stage of the project, each funded project must collect baseline
data following its theme focus and project design and complete a project
operational matrix form to illustrate logical connections among project goals,
objectives, strategies, activities and budget items (specific form will be
provided when awards are granted).
Each funded project must submit a six-month progress report with program
implementation information and specific data as requested by the USDOE and/or
New York State Education Department.
The end-of-year program evaluation report must be submitted to document progress
made toward meeting the project goals and the program performance indicators and
delineate success and impact of the project in promoting technology integration
into teaching and learning as well as improving students’ academic performance
in the core subject areas including technology literacy. Specific report format
or request will be provided to funded projects to reflect possible federal and
state report requirement.
NYSED Consortium Policy for State and Federal Discretionary
Grant Programs:
NYSED oversees many discretionary grant programs. These programs
require NYSED to issue discretionary funds through a competitive grant RFP
(unlike allocational grant programs where grant funds are allocated by formula,
e.g. Title I Part A, Title II Part A, Title IV Part A). The statute pertaining
to a grant program may require or permit a cooperative arrangement of grant
applicants/participants, for the mutual benefit of the grant participants. In
such cases, the participants can form a partnership or consortium to apply for
the grant. In order to do so, the partnership or consortium must meet the
following requirements:
The partnership or consortium must designate one of the participants to serve as the applicant and fiscal agent for the grant. The applicant agency must be an eligible grant recipient. All other consortium members must be eligible grant participants, as defined by the program statute or regulation.
In the event a grant is awarded to a partnership/consortium, the grant or grant contract will be prepared in the name of the applicant agency/fiscal agent, not the partnership/consortium, since the group is not a legal entity.
The applicant agency/fiscal agent must meet the following
requirements:
a. Must be an eligible grant recipient as defined by statute;
b. Must receive and administer the grant funds and submit the required
reports to account for the use of grant funds;
c. Must require consortium partners to sign an agreement with the fiscal
agent that specifically outlines all services each partner agrees to
provide.
d. Must be an active member of the partnership/consortium, except where SUNY
or CUNY Research Foundations are the fiscal agent.
e. Cannot act as a flow-through for grant funds to pass to other recipients.
NYSED may establish a minimum level of direct service to be provided by the
fiscal agent.
f. Is PROHIBITED from subgranting funds to other recipients. The fiscal
agent is permitted to contract for services with other consortium partners
or consultants to provide services that the fiscal agent cannot provide
itself.
g. Must be responsible for the performance of any services provided by the
partners, consultants, or other organizations and must coordinate how each
plan to participate.
10/05/2007