|
DEGREE OF COST-EFFECTIVENESS Reported by School Districts |
||
|
CATEGORY |
INSTRUCTIONAL |
MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT |
|
Not Cost Effective |
1. Use of Shared Decision-Making Councils 2. Multi-Disciplinary Curriculum 3. Block Scheduling 4. Other Uses of Instr. Technology 5. Scheduling Alternatives |
1. Shared Pers. for Cap. Constr. 2. Other Central Admin. Staff 3. Records Management 4. Legal Services 5. Restructuring Central Admin. |
|
Marginally Cost Effective |
1. Homework Help Line 2. Teacher Centers 3. Programs Which Maximize Student Attendance 4. School-to-Work Programs 5. Scheduling Alternatives |
1. Alternative Energy Sources 2. Custodial Services 3. Copying/Printing 4. Records Management 5. Shared Personnel for Cap. Constr. |
|
Moderately Cost Effective |
1. Summer Remedial/Enrichment Programs 2. Teacher Centers 3. Programs to Maximize Student Attendance 4. Systems Change Project 5. Site Based Budgeting |
1. Telephone Service 2. In-House Personnel for Cap. Constr. 3. HVAC 4. Other: O & M 5. Food Service Manager |
|
Highly Cost Effective |
1. Returning Spec. Ed. Students to Dist. 2. Consolidated Summer School 3. Shared Special Education Services 4. Use of Volunteers 5. Library Automation |
1. Self-Funded Workers’ Comp. 2. Direct Purchase of Natural Gas 3. Business Official 4. Health Insurance Consortium 5. Co-op. Liability Insurance |
|
QUESTION: How would you rate a particular cost-effectiveness initiative? |
||
Return to School Operations and Management Services Home Page
Last update by CAS on 12/24/2002